For regulated AI teams

Your own model. Owned, portable across models, and proven for your regulator.

We build your firm its own model, tuned to your book, cheap enough to own and run, with the model-risk evidence your committee and counterparties require. We pick the right model for your task and train to it. Our method re-targets across models as the field moves, so you are never stuck on one.

By submitting, you agree to be contacted about Tensyl Foundry and to receive occasional updates. We won’t share your email. See our Privacy Policy.

A short technical briefing on Tensyl Foundry. No commitment.

Anthropic partner model builds are provider-flexible across Anthropic, Microsoft, and Fireworks

Built for SR 11-7 · NAIC · EU AI Act · FDA PCCP

The problem

You want your own AI. Three walls stop you.

01

Renting, not owning

Frontier API bills scale with every token and never stop. You never own the asset, and you cannot fully control or inspect it.

Your evals are your IP

Rent, and your proprietary logic for what counts as a good answer lives inside someone else's closed model.

02

Generic, not yours

An off-the-shelf model is not tuned to your book, so it underperforms on your lines and your language.

03

Blocked, not deployed

Your model-risk committee will not clear it without provenance and evidence a research boutique will not produce.

How it works

Four steps, about one quarter, built with your team.

  1. Step 1

    Prepare

    Your data, under your controls. We define the use case and the acceptance bar together.

  2. Step 2

    Select

    We choose the best-fit model for your task and budget, from any provider, then train to it.

  3. Step 3

    Signal

    We find the signals in your book that a general-purpose model misses.

  4. Step 4

    Prove

    The evaluator that encodes your standard, plus the evidence pack, deployment-ready and handed to you.

Your data and method stay portable across models. The governance evidence is forged in as first-line documentation, not bolted on after.

Build vs. buy

Foundry vs. building it yourself

Standing up a model on Bedrock or Azure OpenAI with your own governance layer is a real option, and the right one until you need owned weights, regulator-grade evidence, and a cost you control. That is the line Foundry is built for.

Build it yourselfWith Foundry
The assetYou rent API access. No weights you own or can inspect.You own the weights, running in your own cloud.
Fit to your bookA generic model steered with prompts and RAG.Tuned to your data, your lines, and your language.
Model-risk evidenceYou build lineage, evals, and monitoring yourself.Evidence pack forged in as first-line documentation.
Committee sign-offA bespoke package assembled for each review.One accepted format, reusable across every version.
Cost curvePer-token bills that scale with usage, forever.A small model you own, cheap to run at volume.
Provider riskTied to one vendor's roadmap, pricing, and deprecations.Portable across models as the field moves.
Team & timeOngoing load on your ML, risk, and platform teams.About a quarter, built with your team, handed to you.

Table 2. Where an owned model earns its keep. Source: Tensyl, Sep 2026.

Who builds it

Operators who have shipped AI inside regulated workflows.

Shamit Patel

Shamit Patel

Co-Founder & CEO

Product head, Uber Infrastructure and Director at Twitter Growth; product leader for Bing Ads API & platform. VP Product leadership at Instawork (Series D, Benchmark-backed). Rebuilt an operating model around AI and decoupled revenue from headcount.

LinkedIn ↗
Debarshi Kar

Debarshi Kar

Co-Founder & CTO

CTO at Instawork (Series D, Benchmark-backed), from Series A through Series D. Two-time founder with multiple exits; an early pioneer in social and mobile gaming, later CTO of a multibillion-dollar global gaming business. Turned a ten-million-professional labor marketplace into a training ground for real-world robotics.

LinkedIn ↗

The evidence pack

The governance artifacts your committee needs, forged in, not bolted on.

  • Model lineage & data provenance

    SR 11-7 · NAIC
  • Independent-eval results

    SR 11-7 validation
  • Reason-code derivation

    Adverse-action · NAIC
  • Tamper-evident decision log

    Audit · rep & warranty
  • Monitoring & drift detection

    SR 11-7 ongoing monitoring
  • Change-control plan

    PCCP-style · model updates

One accepted format, reusable across counterparties and across every version of your model.

See it for real

Want a sample evidence pack?

We’ll send a redacted example: model lineage, an independent-eval summary, and a change-control page. You will see the exact format your committee would sign off on, before you talk to us.

Redacted and illustrative. Sent by a person, not an automated download.

Continuity by design

You own it, even without us.

You keep the weights, the evals that encode how your firm judges a good answer, the data lineage, and the full evidence pack. Those evals are proprietary logic you would never hand to a closed API, and here they stay yours. If Tensyl ever goes away, your model keeps running in your own cloud and your committee keeps its documentation. No lock-in, and no custodian but you.

Request a briefing

See it on your own use case.

Request a short technical briefing. We’ll walk through Foundry on one of your use cases and what “accepted” would mean for your committee.

By submitting, you agree to be contacted about Tensyl Foundry and to receive occasional updates. We won’t share your email. See our Privacy Policy.